This page (revision-8) was last changed on 29-Nov-2024 16:16 by -jim

This page was created on 29-Nov-2024 16:16 by unknown

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
8 29-Nov-2024 16:16 2 KB -jim to previous
7 29-Nov-2024 16:16 2 KB -jim to previous | to last
6 29-Nov-2024 16:16 2 KB -jim to previous | to last
5 29-Nov-2024 16:16 2 KB -jim to previous | to last
4 29-Nov-2024 16:16 2 KB -jim to previous | to last
3 29-Nov-2024 16:16 2 KB -jim to previous | to last
2 29-Nov-2024 16:16 1 KB -jim to previous | to last
1 29-Nov-2024 16:16 1 KB unknown to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 2 changed one line
[{$pagename}] is a series of numbers that define a [group] ([Society], [Social network] or a [Community of Interest]) sizes that increase by about a factor of three:
[{$pagename}] a series of numbers that define a [group] ([Society], [Social network] or a [Community of Interest]) sizes that increase by about a factor of three:
At line 6 changed one line
* 150 - [friends] (Also [Social network] limit)
* 150 - [friends] (Also [Social network] limit
At line 23 changed 2 lines
!! [{$pagename}] key takeaway?
The [Social contract] failure is due to a [Human Limitation] of how many [persons] an [Individual] can have [relationships] involving [trust] and [Responsibility].
The [Social contract] failure is due to a [Human Limitation] of how many [persons] an [Individual] can have [relationships] involving [trust] and [Responsibility]
At line 26 removed 5 lines
Dunbar's study further showed that, one can:
* have a close relationship with a group of about 5 people
* share a level of deep [trust] with around 15
* have a meaningful [relationship|relationships] with around 50
* and an active contact, stay in touch at least once a year, with about 150 people
At line 32 removed 4 lines
In the context of teamwork, like [Software development], being able to have a stable [social|Social network] relationship with all the individuals on a team provides the benefits of being able to build and maintain empathy, rapport, [trust], safety, and [ownership].
Does this not imply that [organizations|Organizational Entity] that exceed 50 ([hunter-gather]) or certainly a 150 ([friends]) will fail to possess these attributes?