This page (revision-1) was last changed on 29-Nov-2024 16:16 by UnknownAuthor

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
Trust
Trust

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 1 added 68 lines
!!! Overview[1]
[{$pagename}], In a social [context], has several connotations.
Definitions of [{$pagename}] typically refer to a [context] characterized by the following aspects:
* One party ([trustor]) is willing to rely on the actions of another party ([trustee])
* the situation is directed to the future.
!! [Security] exists to facilitate [{$pagename}] [4]
[Bruce Schneier]'s book "''[Liars and Outliers]''", goes into great detail on the [Relationship] between [{$pagename}] that Society.
In addition, the [trustor] (voluntarily or forcedly) allows [delegation] of control over the actions performed by the [trustee]. As a consequence, the [trustor]
* is uncertain about the outcome of the [trustee]'s actions;
* can only develop and evaluate expectations based on [evidence].
The uncertainty involves the [risk] of failure or harm to the [trustor] if the [trustee] will not behave as desired. Often although the [trustee] is [responsible], the [Trustor] is [Accountable]
[{$pagename}] can be attributed to [relationships] between people. It can be demonstrated that humans have a natural disposition to [{$pagename}] and to judge trustworthiness that can be traced to the neurobiological structure and activity of a human brain. Some studies indicate that [{$pagename}] can be altered e.g. by the application of oxytocin.
[{$pagename}] is also attributable to [relationships] within and between social groups (families, friends, [communities|Community of Interest], [organisations|Organizational Entity], companies, [Governments] etc.). [{$pagename}] is a popular approach to frame the dynamics of inter-group and intra-group interactions in terms of [{$pagename}].
When it comes to the [relationship] between [people|Natural Person] and technology, the attribution of [{$pagename}] is a matter of dispute. The intentional stance demonstrates that [{$pagename}] can be validly attributed to human [relationships] with complex technologies. However, rational reflection leads to the rejection of an ability to [{$pagename}] technological artefacts.
One of the key current challenges in the social sciences is to re-think how the rapid progress of technology has impacted constructs such as [{$pagename}]. This is specifically true for [information Technology] that dramatically alters causation in [Social Websites].
!! [{$pagename}] and Creation of [Wealth][3]
* Every transaction creating [wealth] first requires an affirmative decision to [{$pagename}].
* Building [{$pagename}] creates new [wealth].
* Sustaining [{$pagename}] creates recurring [wealth].
* Achieving [{$pagename}] superior to your competition achieves market dominance.
* Leadership rises based on [{$pagename}] (or falls the absence of [{$pagename}]).
!! Trust is...[2]
* the belief that a person or system will behave predictably, even under stress
* based on experience and/or [evidence]
* based on fundamental properties ([Digital Identity], [integrity])
* easy to lose and hard to regain
! A trusted [thing] is…[2]
* predictable, even under stress
* trusted based on experience and/or [evidence]
* based on fundamental properties ([Digital Identity], [integrity])
!! The Trouble with [Trust], & the case for [Accountability] [Frameworks] for [NSTIC] [5]
In [Kaliya Hamlin] speaks as to the [The Trouble with Trust, & the case for Accountability Frameworks for NSTIC|http://www.identitywoman.net/the-trouble-with-trust-the-case-for-accountability-frameworks|target='_blank']
!! Facets Of Building [{$pagename}]
We have gathered several "Facets" for building [{$pagename}]. Although primarily gathered from the aspect of [Information Technology], we believe these are Universal.
||FACET||Description
|[Identification|Digital Identity]|Ask Who Are You?
|[Authentication]|Prove [Identification]
|[Authorization]|Are you allowed to Do this Transaction?
|[Integrity]|Is the [data] you sent the same as Was Received?
|[Confidentiality]|Did anyone else read what you sent?
|[Auditing]|Record Transaction/Communications for Audit
|[Non-Repudiation]|Can prove who sent the message?
|[Transparency]|Did a [Community of Interest] see HOW you did it?
|[Accountability]|answerability, blameworthiness, liability
|[Evidence]|Did a [Community of Interest] see you do it?
|[Reputation]|Did other [Entities|Entity] say they [Trust] you?
|[Context]|You may [{$pagename}] you at work but not in a bar
!! More Information
There might be more information for this subject on one of the following:
[{ReferringPagesPlugin before='*' after='\n' }]
----
* [#1] - [Trust|Wikipedia:Trust_(social_sciences)|target='_blank'] - based on data observed:2015-05-18
* [#2] - [Trust Is|https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/files/resource_files/C3A51E35-1A4B-B294-D002B8E3FD59ACD6/Where%20Trust%20Begins%202014-09-23.pdf|target='_blank'] - based on data observed: 2015-08-26
* [#3] - [Achieving Digital Trust: The New Rules for Business at the Speed of Light|https://www.amazon.com/Achieving-Digital-Trust-Rules-Business/dp/0996599002/|target='_blank'] - based on data observed: 2016-08-16
* [#4] - [Bruce Schneier on Trust|https://www.schneier.com/news/archives/2012/02/bruce_schneier_on_tr.html|target='_blank'] - based on data observed: 2012-09-16
* [#5] - [The Trouble with Trust, & the case for Accountability Frameworks for NSTIC|http://www.identitywoman.net/the-trouble-with-trust-the-case-for-accountability-frameworks|target='_blank'] - based on data observed: 2015-09-16
This page (revision-1) was last changed on 29-Nov-2024 16:16 by UnknownAuthorTop