Overview#
SHOULD NOT or the phrase "NOT RECOMMENDED" (RFC 2119), which are Case-sensitive (RFC 8174) mean that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances when the particular behavior is acceptable or even useful, but the full implications should be understood and the case carefully weighed before implementing any behavior described with this label.We may use SHOULD NOT in other contexts but we are implying the same interpretation as a Best Current Practice
More Information#
There might be more information for this subject on one of the following:- Act (Actor) Claim
- Apple ID
- Authentication Context Class Reference
- Best Practices Password
- Biometric Authentication
- Carrier-grade NAT
- Claims_locales
- Custom URI scheme
- Distinguished Name Case Sensitivity
- Gateway
- HTTP Referer
- HelloRetryRequest
- Identity Custodian
- Identity Token
- Identity questions
- Kerberos Cryptosystem Negotiation Extension
- Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels
- Key wrapping
- KeyUsage
- Loopback Interface Redirection
- May_act (May Act For) Claim
- NIST.SP.800-63B
- NOT RECOMMENDED
- OpenID Connect Back-Channel Logout
- PCI Data Security Standard v3.2
- Password Anti-Pattern
- Password Character Composition
- Password Expiration
- Password Periodic Changes
- Password Validator
- Privacy Considerations
- Private Communications Technology
- RFC 2119
- Refresh Token
- Response_type
- Security Considerations
- Ten Hundred Words
- URI Path
- URI Query
- Ui_locales
- Uniform Resource Identifier
- UserInfo Response
- Web Authentication
- Web Blog_blogentry_031017_1